First of all, I would like to clarify the status and roles played by the constitutions below :
1) Police : follow to the law to arrest and suggest a suspect to be charged.
2) Jugde : follow to the law to adjudge and sentence a culprit if found guilty.
The both constitutions are generally known with the role and responsibility above-mentioned.
There is a similarity of them, that' s they act according to law stated in 'Perlembagaan Tubuh Kerajaan Negeri Perak darul-Ridzuan'.
The next thing to discuss is who is the one established the Perak State Constitution ('Perlembagaan Tubuh Kerajaan Negeri Perak darul-Ridzuan') ?
Of course as we know the state law was established by the Perak State Assemblypersons, that means Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak Darul-Ridzuan.
Therefore, who's the head of the DUN of Perak ? Of course it is the Speaker, Sivakumar.
Now, based on the analysis above conclusion as below :
1) Police & Judge : follow the law established by the DUN
2) DUN Speaker : the head of the constitution who establish the state law.
Therefore, who has the authority in term of :
a) Level of Constitution based on Perak State Law
b) Ruling the DUN
Of course the answer is the DUN Speaker !! As DUN Speaker is the head of DUN, who establish the law and the police/judge are the one who execute the law established.
Therefore how can judge rejected DUN Speaker's decision ????
Based on what law the judge follow ??? Umno & BN's law ??????